J jnoble Joined Sep 27, 2009 Messages 17 Thanks Received 1 Thanks Given 0 Jan 30, 2014 #1 woold like a opinion on this badge is it a good one with a vary odd attachment plate You don't have permission to view attachments. Attachments You don't have permission to view attachments.
woold like a opinion on this badge is it a good one with a vary odd attachment plate You don't have permission to view attachments.
N nigel2003 Joined Jan 18, 2010 Messages 26 Thanks Received 2 Thanks Given 0 Feb 2, 2014 #2 looks like a copy
S stuart Joined Jun 6, 2009 Messages 1,740 Thanks Received 137 Thanks Given 40 Feb 2, 2014 #3 my concerns would be the fact the swas looks fatter than usual but more importantly there are no maker marks or rzm marks to the reverse
my concerns would be the fact the swas looks fatter than usual but more importantly there are no maker marks or rzm marks to the reverse
Garry . Admin Joined Jun 5, 2009 Messages 9,201 Thanks Received 3,500 Thanks Given 1,912 May 1, 2015 #4 Just came across this thread. Yes, with a badge that was introduced in Dec 1936 there should be RZM markings.
Just came across this thread. Yes, with a badge that was introduced in Dec 1936 there should be RZM markings.
