
No need, I bent it with my fingers. You usually can with a cast, coz it`s not as compact. Still has a bit on the body and all on the diamond, so could do so in another video when the situation arises.I was kinda looking forward to seeing the pliers actually gripping the badge, bending it and shattering the plastic. However, funny as and a top job as always
![]()
What they really look like, and where they are?So ..... where are the good ones?
What they really look like, and where they are?
What do we actually know?
- How many were produced= No
- Why they were awarded=No
- How many were awared=No
- When they were first awarded=No
- When they were last awarded=No
What we do know....
- Authors, dealers, auction house, collectors, all disagree on which ones are genuine and fake.
- They have been faked for at least 40 years.
- The Aurich-marked versions are cast fakes.
- The Gold plated/gilded/pained one I reviewed two years ago is a cast fake.
- The one I reviewed is identical the supposed ground dug ones as well as the others that are offered for sale by places like Weitze. (see above post on letter I & H)
Thats all we know right now.
The solution?
Anyone claiming to have a genuine one, needs to prove it is not the same as the two reviewed and exposed as cast fakes. Even good close-up images of just a few parts would solve that question. Like a close-up of the letters H and I on the body. And then maybe close-ups of other parts.
The claimers:
Anyone who owns one, claims it is original, yet fails to provide any detailed images, cannot be believed.
Only a detailed look at the actual item will provide clear answers.
Maybe, the original looks very similar to the ones exposed, and has been missed because it`s been lumped into the huge group of fakes.
Maybe only 12 were awared and all are lost?
Maybe only 124 were awarded and all are lost?
Maybe maybe maybe, and that`s all you will ever have until people LOOK at their items.
Not quite a mystery wrapped in an enigma Mike but I know what you mean We know it was awarded in Holland and Norway definitely and we are quite sure the awards began in 1941 but as Jo says, the rest is currently speculation. This confusion is exploited by some but as Jo has shown, if the fakes are followed we can see the extent of that exploitation
Norwegen
What they really look like, and where they are?
What do we actually know?
- How many were produced= No
- Why they were awarded=No
- How many were awared=No
- When they were first awarded=No
- When they were last awarded=No
What we do know....
- Authors, dealers, auction house, collectors, all disagree on which ones are genuine and fake.
- They have been faked for at least 40 years.
- The Aurich-marked versions are cast fakes.
- The Gold plated/gilded/pained one I reviewed two years ago is a cast fake.
- The one I reviewed is identical the supposed ground dug ones as well as the others that are offered for sale by places like Weitze. (see above post on letter I & H)
Thats all we know right now.
The solution?
Anyone claiming to have a genuine one, needs to prove it is not the same as the two reviewed and exposed as cast fakes. Even good close-up images of just a few parts would solve that question. Like a close-up of the letters H and I on the body. And then maybe close-ups of other parts.
The claimers:
Anyone who owns one, claims it is original, yet fails to provide any detailed images, cannot be believed.
Only a detailed look at the actual item will provide clear answers.
Maybe, the original looks very similar to the ones exposed, and has been missed because it`s been lumped into the huge group of fakes.
Maybe only 12 were awared and all are lost?
Maybe only 124 were awarded and all are lost?
Maybe maybe maybe, and that`s all you will ever have until people LOOK at their items.
Hi Brig and welcome to the forum. Wim Saris posted a picture of the badge from the publication Schwert und Spaten. Let me find it and I'll post the link in a moment.
Okay, posts 98 and 99 of this thread discuss and show that picture![]()
I hope so...that image doesn't even show the words, I certainly hope that's not the only reference to go off of.Maybe someone can provide a better picture from the SuS magazine. No doubt about the form for the badge.
Maybe some other old magazine may have shown and described this badge. I have not ever seen it, but who knows?